TFNR - Particles / Vortices
Particles of Ordinary Matter are compact Vortices, Physical Structures of Information "in" the Elementary Field, which, within the natural turbulence in the various Components of the Elementary Action that characterizes the spontaneous dynamics of the Field itself, represent the fundamental elements of the ordinary structure of the cosmos, of its visible side (produced by the dynamics of its causal and variational precursors - spatial and temporal: Dark Matter / InfoStructures of Dark Energy).
Particles / Vortices are Compact / concentrated / condensed Vortex-type Information Structures with high mass density belonging to the class of "Visible Structures" of Matter. We repeat here everything we have said about Dark Halos, adapting it to the peculiar characteristics, properties, behaviors, dynamics and phenomena of the Particles that make up Ordinary (visible) Matter.
Particles are the visible building blocks of Ordinary Matter objects of the Universe. They form the visible parts of galaxies and the object within them, like clusters of stars, single stars and their planetary systems, rocks and all the objects of our physical experience. Particles make up the filaments between the bubbles that shape the Cosmic Web (an infinite chain of visible matter concentrated in the dense small-medium size Dark Matter / Dark Energy Halos hosting clusters and galaxies).
Let's try to explain what the expression reported above means, a definition that may appear a little cryptic, but which, in light of what has been said so far about this model of description of Physical Reality and the various and innumerable hypotheses that we have placed at the basis of the nature and evolution of the Universe, should not be so much so.
Speaking precisely of the Dark Halos, we have seen how the mechanical interactions between such Halos (the friction of the boundaries of Dark Energy) produce Elementary Vortices / Particles of Ordinary Matter (visible), which subsequently evolve towards Composite Vortices / Particles and wave-like Infostructures of Radiant Energy, then Complex Vortices / Particles, atoms, molecules, etc.. Therefore, the Dark Halos / Vortices, within the dark turbulence, are the primordial Structures that have persistently organized the Elementary Field, triggering the subsequent evolutionary processes that have produced everything that today constitutes the visible Universe: the Particles and everything that is composed of them.
More in detail we can say that in the friction zones between two Dark Halos, zones with positive Mass, Dark Energy, particularly compressed by the dynamics of the Dark Halos related to Galaxies, but above all clusters and superclusters, the turbulent dynamics in all the components of the Elementary Action favors the generation of micro vortices that under strict equilibrium conditions can acquire such persistence as to allow a lifespan such as to be able to propagate even at considerable distances within the interstitial filaments of the Dark structure of the cosmos.
What does "strict equilibrium conditions" mean? It means that the elementary microvortices, dragged by the rotational dynamics of the Halos in friction, immersed in the remarkably turbulent dynamics of those portions of the Elementary Field, in positive Mass / Dark Energy environments, therefore very energetic / dynamic, acquire relativistic speeds, increasing Masses that lead to a notable stabilization and lengthening of the life span, which allow the Particle to live and propagate long enough to have a good chance of colliding with another elementary or composite particle, in the high energy collision forming more complex more stable Particles or that decay into more stable Particles. We can imagine the microvortices produced by friction as Elementary Particles such as electrons or positrons accelerated to relativistic speeds by the rotational mechanical dynamics of the Halos and by the magnetic fields produced by them.
These elementary Particles, in the first collisions in the ancient cosmic eras in which the first Ordinary Matter was formed, colliding with other particles of the same type, thanks to the notable relativistic Masses linked to the immense speeds reached, formed the first composite Particles, protons formed by quarks and gluons, super turbulent lumps, which for their perfect (even if incomprehensible at the current state of development of particle physics) adaptation to the energetic environment of the filaments and nodes of the Cosmic Web (dynamics of the Elementary Field and the Structures that form in it) satisfied or evolved towards equilibrium conditions that ensured their causal permanence. These Particles that accumulated over very long periods of time, gradually formed all the Ordinary Matter that we see today in clouds of gas and dust, or condensed in celestial objects, stars, galaxies, and so on, which gradually went to populate the Dark Structures with the appropriate characteristics (sufficient density of Mass, spatial extension, rotational dynamics, etc.).
In different places in the cosmos, in different eras, at different rates, according to "normal" or absolutely peculiar dynamics, Ordinary Matter (visible) has accumulated, condensed, lit up, to form the wonderful luminous trails that we can admire today in the filaments and nodes of the Cosmic Web. Even today, always and forever, new Ordinary Matter, new micro vortices, silently, darkly, form and, accelerated, collide with other elementary Particles thus formed, or with more "mature" Particles, atoms / molecules of gas, dust, and so on, producing in the impacts, thanks to their Energy (Mass, Motion, Charge, Spin), new Matter that is added to the existing one. New Ordinary Matter that goes to populate the Dark Structures, also in incessant evolution. Visible dynamics immersed in the invisible dynamics, Ordinary Matter in the Dark, in incessant co-evolution towards ever higher levels of causal and variational complexity (spatial and temporal).
Shape
The Particles of Ordinary Matter (visible), as mentioned, are concentrated / microscopic corporal vortical structures with high density of Mass belonging to the class of "InfoStructures" of Ordinary Matter. As for the shape, at least for the elementary Particles, we can ideally imagine them as regions of (almost) spherical shape of the Elementary Field with specific and peculiar profiles of distribution of the Elementary Action in its various Components.
They appear as very small curled bubbles in microscopic turbulence, with nested levels of indistinct turbulence, from the scale of the particles themselves up to the Planck scale and even lower.
We can think of turbulence in a fluid, or in a superfluid, where gradients, flows and vortices form and disappear incessantly, sometimes they are preserved and take on a recognizable shape that can be associated precisely with that of a bubble, a three-dimensional vortex, which for a certain time resists the transformative forces, in the continuous push and pull between constructive and destructive, structuring and destructuring, organizational and disorganizational processes, organization balanced between chaos and order.
Comparing what we are saying about particles with what we have said about Dark Matter / Dark Energy Halos, the identities, similarities, symmetries are evident. In many respects the only difference concerns the scale of size, immense for Dark Structures, microscopic for Ordinary Structures, which we call Ordinary Matter Particles. It is clear that we are repeating what was said in the section on Dark Halos, adapting it to the peculiar nature, shape, characteristics, properties, behaviors, dynamics, etc. of Particles.
But how do these distribution profiles of the Elementary Action in its different Components present themselves? As we have said, the general shape of a Dark Halo can ideally be thought of as spherical. But precisely because these are shapes that emerge from turbulence, immersed in turbulence, that feed on turbulence, so to speak, the real shapes can also be very far from the ideal ones, which still remain a sort of chaotic attractors of shape.
The variety of shapes and transformations that these shapes can undergo, both for internal dynamics and for interactions with the turbulent environment and with other Particles, even of different types (and therefore of different sizes, shapes and dynamics), but above all for their large spatial and energetic concentrations, and for extremely short propagation times of Causality, Action, Information / Energy, are much more limited than what happens for Dark Halos. Particles, especially elementary ones, tend to maintain a much more regular shape, even if their dynamics, especially in the relativistic regime, can deform them, shrink them, make them more massive, extend their life, etc.
- INCLUDES IMAGE - PARTICLE SHAPES OF ORDINARY MATTER -
As we can see from the illustration, in a Particle (for simplicity we refer to an elementary Particle, therefore not composed of other Particles) we can identify an internal region (volume) separated by a boundary from the external region, virtually infinite and extended to the entire infinite and unlimited Universe. Here too, and even more so since the densities of Mass and Charge are here extremely more intense than in the case of the Halos / Vortices of Ordinary Matter (visible), the limit of spatial extension of this external region, and therefore of the entire Halo, is localized in the surface (irregular, even if ideally spherical, as we said) on which the correlations of the components of the Elementary Action (in particular Perturbation, whose correlation represents the Mass, and Rotation:Chirality, whose correlation represents the Charge) assume values lower than the Uncertainty limit.
For Vortices / Particles, much more than for Dark Halos, given the scale of their spatial extensions and the speed of their dynamics, dependent on the greater proximity to the Planck scale, and for the typology of the phenomena that integrate them, the effect that is called "superposition of quantum states" is much more evident and can significantly impact the shape of the Structure. We speak for example of the superposition of the directions of Spin, or of the position in space, or even of the trajectories followed in the Motion.
For the direction of Spin, for example, as already illustrated in the previous sections, it is possible, or highly probable that an elementary Particle, an electron for example, at the same time manifests more directions of Spin, before and after an event that we call measurement, or observation, always an interaction in which one of the interacting objects is an observer or a measuring device, an event that by its nature and phenomenology "produces in the Particle under examination a very rapid alignment of the direction of orientation of Spin of all the event points of the Elementary Field that at that precise moment are supporting the Structure.
Once the device (in this case a magnet) that was used for the measurement is removed, the Particle begins to evolve again, and so does its shape that fluctuates around the attractor of the ideal shape of the entire Structure. Each event point, due to the natural turbulence of the Elementary Field, the internal dynamics of the elementary particle, the interactions with other particles, will express its own evolution, and so portions of the Structure can evolve differently. This translates into a superposition of states, since at any moment the Structure can have different portions that express a different Rotation:AxisOrientation correlation. And this means superposition of different Spin orientations.
Vortex InfoStructures tend to evolve in the following ways:
- Rest Mass and Charge remain constant for each type and subtype of Structure (e.g. InfoStructure - type: Vortex - subtype: Elementary, an electron will always have the same Rest Mass, even if its overall Mass, Rest Mass plus Relativistic Mass, and will always have a negative Charge equal to a defined, quantized value);
- Motion and Spin are globally and partially variable and variant; at the same time different parts of the Structure can show different correlations of orientation of Translation (Motion) and/or different correlations of direction of Rotation:AxisOrientation.
Just like the position of the centers of Mass and Charge (and the orientation / intensity of the Inertial Motion deriving from the Translation correlation, as well as the orientation of the Spin axis, deriving from the Rotation:AxisOrientation correlation), also the position of the separation surface between the internal region and the external region, i.e. between the region of negative Mass and the region of positive Mass (Dark Energy), as well as the surface that ideally contains the entire Vortex / Particle are variables, determine its shape and depend, as mentioned, on the internal dynamics and external interactions.
Physical aspects and quantities
In addition to their shape, spatial extent and location of significant places (such as the separation surface between the inner and outer regions), Vortices/Particles are characterized by other significant physical aspects and quantities. Among the most significant we find:
- total Mass (positive and negative, sum of moduli, amount of inhomogeneity), average density and density profile of negative and positive Mass,
- speed and direction of the Motion of displacement in the Elementary Field, any acceleration, its position and dynamics with respect to the surrounding Particles, external gradients, flows and vortices, level and characteristics of the external turbulence in which it is immersed (virtual particles)
- dynamics of internal turbulent Motions, internal motions and velocities, internal gradients, flows and vortices, level and characteristics of internal turbulence
- total Charge (positive or negative, left-handed or right-handed chirality), relation with general cosmic chirality, superlocal or local,
- Orientation of the Spin axis of the Structure and relation with the orientation of the Spins of the surrounding Structures, intensity and profiles of internal magnetic fields, presence and intensity of external magnetic fields, general, superlocal or local.
In addition to these fundamental physical quantities, in the section "Complex physical quantities and phenomena" we mentioned other more complex Forces / Fields (and interactions), Weak and Strong nuclear forces and fields, derived forces and fields that are differently related to types of elementary, composite and complex particles, such as quarks, electrons, protons, neutrons, atomic nuclei, etc.) and related phenomena. I mentioned these particles in the sections "Mixed structures - Complex Particles / Vortices and Interactions" and "Properties of the Structures of Information".
Scale of size
As for the scale of size of the spatial extension, we can say that Particles are concentrated on fairly narrow scale intervals, as well as for the Energy intervals. We can call these intervals, resonances. Given that for the same "energy environment" in which it is immersed, each particle will have its own fixed "rest" spatial extension, or quasi-fixed due to the fluctuations of the Field (uncertainty).
As we have mentioned, the spatial dimensions of particles are variable due to various factors, among which the most relevant ones concern the speed of Motion (for relativistic speeds their spatial dimensions also reduce considerably as they approach the upper limit of the propagation speed, just as the relativistic Mass, product of the Rest Mass by the Lorenz factor, varies, increasing as they approach the limiting speed) and the situation of possible compression due to specific forces or phenomena (e.g. compression of electrons in the innermost orbits of the atom due to electrostatic attraction.
Composite particles, e.g. protons, are even more complex and dominated by turbulence (a "soup" of quarks, gluons, and a lot of turbulence that is interpreted as a set of virtual particles with an ephemeral life that immensely complicate the study of the internal dynamics and the determination of the fundamental parameters of these particles), difficult to model and compute.
And again, another leap in complexity, the Vortices / Complex Particles (e.g. atomic nuclei, and other "exotic" aggregates of elementary and composite particles), where dynamics and phenomena, forces and derived fields intervene, where more complex physical quantities emerge, also linked to the shape of the aggregates themselves and the relationships between the Structures that compose them.
Up to the atomic scale, where spatial extensions are linked to the quantity of components, to the extension of the "electronic cloud" that can be supported by the atomic nucleus, by the number of protons present that determine the total electrostatic charge of the nucleus and therefore the number of electrons that can be bound to the atom and that make it neutral, a condition of minimum (electrical) Energy.
Of course, from the most elementary particles to atomic nuclei, everything can ideally be modeled and described in terms of the Dynamics of Elementary Action and its Modes / Components, and the correlations between stochastic / deterministic processes (chaos / order processes) that design its shape, dynamics and influence its interactions and phenomena.
Detection
Unlike what we said about the Vortices / Dark Halos, where all the attempts at detection have so far proved fruitless, except obviously for the indirect observations through the gravitational effects produced on Ordinary Matter (visible) and more generally on the organization of the cosmic structure, in the case of Particles the collection of data on their nature, structure and dynamics are infinite. We can say that a large part of the investments of economic and human resources in basic scientific research have gone and continue to go in the broad field of particle physics. Very expensive colliders that centralize countless experiments, thousands of researchers involved and distributed across the planet, immense theoretical efforts, etc.
The products of all this tireless activity are set like precious gems in the most consolidated models and theories, Quantum Mechanics, Quantum Field Theory, Standard Model of Particles. Honor to all the researchers who in various ways have been part of this titanic work.
"Nevertheless"... yes, many of us say "nevertheless"... Nevertheless, despite everything, some, perhaps many, pieces of the puzzle do not seem to fit together properly. Sometimes I think that, as with cosmology, the situation is even worse. That there is a fundamental error in the way we observe Nature at small scales, that we are missing something fundamental, to reach a unitary, profound and, at the same time, general vision of Energy and Matter. Sometimes it seems to me that those models and theories so laboriously developed by generations of scientists, which in some respects allow us to predict with such accuracy what happens in our laboratories, are as if they were interposing themselves between us and further possible, desirable, advances. As if they allowed us to measure, observe, predict, but made our life particularly difficult when we try to describe, interpret, imagine, visualize.
I think this depends on various factors, which I have tried to highlight in various parts of this work. Here, one aspect in particular comes to mind. I believe that one of the problems that make life most difficult is a tendency to extrapolate models, explanations, mathematics, from their ontological and phenomenal context and extend them to all Physical Reality, as dogmas, absolute truths, which although nominally considered hypotheses, repeated endlessly, like a sacred mantra, have become so rooted in the subconscious of the community of researchers that it influences and directs everything, in a subtle and unfortunately uncritical way.
An example. We saw the first one in a recent section, talking about photons and electromagnetic waves. Given that Waves and Vortices in the model I propose here, despite having different shapes and dynamics, share the same nature and rootedness in the Dynamics of Elementary Action, as seen, the theme of the wave / particle duality regarding photons / electromagnetic waves, the difficulty of reconciling such different, opposite properties and dynamics, in phenomena that should concern the same type of physical entities, in my opinion comes precisely from the tendency to extend what seem to be universal insights and instead are not the only ones.
There is no doubt that radio waves are Waves, electromagnetic waves, where one cycle follows the other in a coherent and synchronized way. And normally each cycle has the same wavelength and perhaps the same polarization, intensity, energy, etc. And why should we ever think that light is made up of the same types of waves, with the same origin, the same shape, etc. It is not enough that both types of phenomena (emission of a radio wave by a conductor, an antenna, powered by an alternating current produced by a special generator, the transmitter) can be classified under the same theories (electromagnetism and then quantum electrodynamics).
Do we perhaps think that an electron bouncing in an atom is an antenna, a metal conductor carrying an electric current? Let's say that Quantum Mechanics has not helped, in this sense. All wave mechanics, in my opinion, has provided an interesting predictive model, etc., but has introduced a great ontological and phenomenological confusion in an already confused panorama. It has provided a misleading interpretation, inducing a misunderstanding of the true nature of the wave function. The wave function is a mathematical construction in the space of quantum states. It is not the description of a wave in Physical Reality. Therefore, most of the illustrations found in many articles, books, videos, etc. are completely wrong, and even worse, misleading, dangerous, and denote a poor understanding of what we are talking about. I am a bit drastic, but it is incredible how much nonsense is found in the field of science. Endless repetitions of the same nonsense, seasoned in a thousand different ways. Fortunately, there are first-rate researchers and popularizers who raise a level that would otherwise be a little low.
So, returning to photons and electromagnetic waves of this example, as illustrated in the dedicated sections, a photon is an InfoStructure of the "Wave" type, "Single-Cycle" subtype, which due to its localizability, finite spatial extension, and other important characteristics, can sometimes appear in observations as a Particle (but in fact it is not a Vortex / Particle). It is emitted by an electron that decelerates while returning to a position of the free atomic cloud, corresponding to the state of lowest energy. While an electromagnetic wave, for example a radio wave emitted by an antenna powered by a transmitter, is an InfoStructure of the "Wave" type, "Multi-cycle" subtype, which due to its poor localizability, virtually infinite spatial extension, and other important characteristics, in observations appears precisely as a wave.
The Single Cycle Wave hypothesis of photons seems to satisfy the requirements and resolve the main issue of duality. This form seems to provide a high compatibility with corpuscular (localization) and wave (interference) behaviors.
Returning to the detectability of the InfoStructures of Ordinary Matter, ideally it seems possible to make observations and measurements in all the Components of the Action and that through their correlations and combinations produce the fundamental physical quantities and the related phenomena. Only for the Mass and gravitational phenomena, the detection of a single Particle, which has a very small Mass (e.g. electron), is extremely difficult. It is much easier to make measurements of the quantities related to the Motion, or of the Charge and Spin. The use of electromagnetic phenomena, in particular, provides both tools to manipulate the Particles (e.g. lasers, radio waves, etc.) and to detect them (various emissions).
Their extremely modest spatial extension and the dynamics expressed on very small time scales, significantly limit the possibility of direct observation. To discover the properties and behaviors of Particles, especially composite ones, it is necessary to use very complex methodologies, and often sophisticated and expensive instrumentation.
Dynamics
While for Dark Halos, since they are objects not sufficiently understood and described by conventional science, I have tried to outline the most relevant aspects of internal and external dynamics, for Particles, given the immense progress of modern particle physics, I will only outline a few aspects that I consider to be of primary importance. In the next sections of this chapter, I will try to describe some models of these Structures, of the phenomena in which they are protagonists and of the dynamics that manifest themselves.
Let us reiterate once again that chaos, turbulence and uncertainty are at the basis of Physical Reality, and therefore also Particles by their nature, formation and dynamics share these aspects and are in some way influenced by them. No form, no physical quantity of Particles can be considered perfectly certain and immutable. Uncertainty, as highlighted by the Principle of the same name, is ontological, not epistemological
A step further. I believe that not only is it not possible to know at the same time with infinite precision the value of two conjugated variables (e.g. position and moment), but that it is not possible to know perfectly the instantaneous value of any variable. And this in relation both to the natural spontaneous turbulence that animates the Elementary Field and constitutes the source of Existence and the "raw material" of all that exists, and to the fundamental nature of Time. We have spoken about this on numerous occasions in this work.
In the middle of this generative chaos, this omnipresent turbulence, the emerging organization of correlations (Relations) between Processes of Events constitutes Information / Energy that is organized into Structures of Information, which represent the bricks with which the Forms and the Universe are incessantly built. Information that tends to be conserved, that evolves for conservation, for a causal and variational permanence that allows the incessant evolution of Reality towards ever new and greater levels of Complexity.
These Processes can and must be described and modeled through stochastic / deterministic processes, and processes of processes, which in their intertwining and relations, design the evolution of the structures of Reality. The stochastic part of these processes probabilistically describes this seething of randomness, turbulence and indeterminacy, while the part that we call deterministic, perhaps improperly, but I can't think of a better term, describes the existing Information that tends to be preserved, even through transformations, which are precisely one of the fundamental aspects of dynamics.
Even for Particles, even for the elementary ones that are not composed, not made up of components, of parts, we can hypothesize the existence of internal, as well as external, dynamics (interactions with the environment, that is with the Elementary Field and its spontaneous dynamics, and with other Dark and Ordinary Structures). Regarding internal dynamics, in addition to the theme of natural turbulence, we reiterate that Vortices / Particles, even the elementary ones, are not immaterial points, nor monolithic and homogeneous marbles, nor immaterial and abstract clouds of probability, nor mere solutions of equations. They are real objects, "Structures", with a non-uniform spatial distribution of the correlations of the Components of the Elementary Action, which describe the Modes in which the spatial fluctuations (Elementary Events) of the Field manifest themselves and produce the stochastic / deterministic processes that we observe as Particles, with their physical quantities that represent average values in Space and Time.
And so their interactions. Relations between such distributions, between forms that approach, sometimes repel, sometimes attract and interpenetrate, processes of processes, turbulence that reorganizes itself on infinitesimal distances in ultra-rapid times, following rigorous vector laws, and in forms, Information, which incessantly emerges and re-emerges from this turbulence, floats on it so to speak, like the white foam rides the waves of the turbulent and dark ocean. Will we ever be able to express these poetic images in equations, their meaning for the description of Reality, of Particles and their interactions? In some sense, conventional physics is already doing it.. but reading those equations we struggle to see and understand the wave, the ocean, the foam, the wind, the coast, and everything that true Reality is made of. And so, from those equations we imagine, hypothesize, fantasize, and we are not always able to grasp "Reality in its reality".
Internal dynamics... we have already mentioned the most relevant and surprising aspect, the superposition of quantum states. Let's take the image of the Spin of an electron again. Intrinsic angular momentum. Intrinsic means that the Spin does not derive from the rotation of the electron. It is something that comes from the inside, that happens inside, that depends on the very nature of the electron, on its shape, on the organization of the processes that make its existence possible. Each event point of the region of the Elementary Field that from time to time supports the electron, each event point animated by the natural spontaneous turbulence of the Field, at that precise moment superimposes on the turbulence the correlation of the temporal distribution of the spatial fluctuations that replace the Elementary Events. Each point is Perturbation, Translation and Rotation, Chirality and Orientation of the Axis of Rotation / Chirality. Each point, in the correlation with the other points of the aforementioned region of the Field, each point, as part of a Vortex-type Structure, is a source of Spin, and the correlation of this dynamic characteristic on all the points that support the electron represents its Spin as a unitary, individual Particle.
But, this correlation is never expressed at its maximum potential (the axis of Rotation / Chirality of all the event points oriented in the same precise direction). Each point has its chaotic component and the perfect unidirectional orientation would require a very large, almost infinite energy to be realized and maintained. The equilibrium conditions of the existence of the Particle in the Field, for the electron, provide a specific "rest" value. Around that specific intensity of correlation (which expresses the intrinsic angular momentum in the spatial directions considered) is distributed the effective value (remember the stochastic / deterministic process theme that we can use to describe the dynamics of the Particle, the electron in this case).
In this turbulent context on which the Information that gives shape to the Structure under examination is superimposed, everything is in continuous fluctuation around punctual and global values of this type of Vortex / Particle. While the global values are substantially constant and stable (within the limits of indeterminacy, obviously), the punctual values can be very variable, determining an internal dynamic that is also very intense and rapid. Dynamics of the individual points and their correlations can spontaneously organize themselves in local "resonances" of portions of the Particle. To use the language of conventional physics in terms of quantum mechanics, it is as if partial entanglements, of portions, of sets of event points spontaneously formed and evolved under entanglement within the Particle, almost as if, while respecting the overall shape of the electron, different portions of it lived a life of their own and produced physical quantities (the orientation of the Spin axis in this case) of different values, in incessant evolution, and interaction between them.
Here, what we are hypothesizing about the internal dynamics of Particles corresponds to various "abstract" expressions that we find in Quantum mechanics and honestly I struggle to understand:
- presence of quantum turbulence / virtual particles that produce various effects (masking of the charge, etc.)
- when it is said that a Particle interacts with itself
- when it is said that a Particle at a given instant is in a superposition of different quantum states (e.g. spin up and spin down)
- when it is said that the superposition of quantum states of a Particle due to a measurement (an interaction) "collapses" to a "defined" quantum state
Rewritten on the basis of the hypotheses that we have expressed here, it should sound more or less like this:
- presence of quantum turbulence / virtual particles that produce various effects (masking of the charge, etc.) -> the life of a particle is suspended between chaos and order, its shape and its dynamics are organized around a chaotic attractor that is conserved to the extent that the "conditions of equilibrium" or "existence conditions" are respected (compatibility with the dynamics of the Field and the environment in which the Particle is immersed)
- when it is said that a Particle interacts with itself -> different portions of the Particle manifest different correlations, and in continuous evolution also influenced by the outside, in one or more Components of the Elementary Action, and therefore different fundamental physical quantities; until we take a snapshot everything is in constant evolution and we cannot know if at a given instant the global result, for the particle as a whole, of these partially independent evolutions will be spin up or spin down; the snapshot by its nature will produce the alignment of all partial processes; after taking the snapshot, the evolution of the partial processes will continue from a state of alignment towards a progressive divergence and an ever greater independence of the partial processes due to the turbulence of the Field, the interactions with the outside that can affect the Particle from different directions with different influence on the various portions of the same)
- when we say that a Particle at a given instant is in a superposition of different quantum states (e.g. spin up and spin down) -> the processes of the internal dynamics of a Particle can express different levels of uniformity / non-uniformity, correlation / independence, etc.; if at a given instant, different portions of the same Particle are evolving in a non-uniform or not completely uniform way, this can be represented as a superposition of quantum states; the same particle, but different portions with different spin orientations at the same time
- when we say that the superposition of quantum states of a Particle as a result of a measurement (an interaction) "collapses" to a "defined" quantum state -> when we make a measurement, when we take a snapshot of the Particle, it is as if we were going to ask each event point to pose for the photo; if its orientation is even just a billionth of a degree "up", we ask it to turn completely in the "up" direction, vice versa for the "down". In this way, instantly when the flash flashes, the situation is clearly and unmistakably defined. The photo is precise and defined, "not blurred" or indefinite. But from the instant immediately following the shot, each point starts to go partially on its way again, to fluctuate around a value, a spatial orientation quite compliant with that necessary to maintain the general shape of the Particle, the famous "equilibrium conditions", the "chaotic attractor", etc.
In this sense, we can see Particles as dynamic systems (linear and non-linear) in incessant internal and external evolution, with "quasi-conservation" of the shape and of the peculiar physical quantities, in continuous interaction with the Elementary Field and the other InfoStructures present in it. The external dynamics influences the internal dynamics. And the internal dynamics influences the way in which the Particle reacts to the external dynamics.
Regarding external dynamics, given the vast production of studies and research that characterize particle physics, here I will not add anything to what has already been expressed in many parts of this chapter, as well as in the second chapter. In this context, the phenomenon that I consider most significant and important for understanding nature, properties, form and dynamics of Particles is quantum entanglement. After what has been expressed regarding internal dynamics, this topic takes on a different and, in my opinion, clearer light, in light of the hypotheses formulated in this work of mine. Entanglement (correlation of quantum states) between particles (let's call it external entanglement) takes on a clearer meaning if considered from the point of view of internal entanglement (structure of correlations between the dynamics, partially non-homogeneous, of the different portions of event points that support the Particle), as briefly described above.
Another phenomenon of primary importance for understanding the dynamics of Particles is interference. This is a concept borrowed from the physics of materials, fluids in particular. The waves that propagate on the surface of water, when they meet, interfere constructively or destructively, creating particular interference structures. These concepts have been extended to optical phenomena, where effects are actually produced that suggest that they are produced by interference phenomena. However, it is difficult to reconcile this position with the corporeal nature of photons. And so this bizarre concept of wave-particle duality was born. Strengthened by the discovery that even Particles such as the electron seem to interfere like light, albeit at different, smaller dimensional scales.
I do not believe that photons (single-cycle waves), as well as waves (e.g. radio waves, multi-cycle waves), interfere. Single-photon experiments, in my opinion, make this explanation unlikely and frankly implausible. Self-interference, or self-interaction of the photon with itself, does not convince me. I also believe that the fact that the Pauli exclusion principle does not apply to bosons, a class of particles to which the photon belongs, may somehow have a meaning. While I expect that two electrons cannot occupy the same portion of the Elementary Field, or, if you like, of Space-time, in an atom, and therefore by extension, two electrons cannot overlap in the Elementary Field, be in the same portion of Space-time, for bosons it does not seem to be so.
Two photons passing through each other, two ripples in propagation of the Field, which, after having overlapped for a very small instant, will continue on their trajectories without having been modified in the slightest. Given the level of saturation of the Field by electromagnetic waves at all wavelengths, with e.m. radiation densities that can be very high even in what we (erroneously) call empty space, with particularly intense concentrations in cosmic regions and at particular wavelengths (hydrogen emission, for example), how could radio waves propagate at distances of billions of light years without undergoing devastating deformation by interference. Who knows how many encounters with photons of comparable wavelength a photon emitted, for example, ten billion years ago will have had on its path to our planet today. And instead light and radio waves seem to be influenced mainly by gravity, by masses, and secondarily by magnetic fields. But it does not seem that they are influenced by interference (constructive or destructive) with other light or radio waves. In short, there are too many inconsistencies and dark sides.
These phenomena must find a different explanation, which must be sought in the structure of the Elementary Field in the regions where diffraction and interference are thought to be triggered (edges?, slits?, gratings?, etc.). But we will deal with this complicated and decisive matter in a specific subsequent section dedicated to the "Double slit experiment".
Links to the tables of contents of TFNR Paper
