TFNR - Matter and Antimatter
Matter-antimatter asymmetry (or baryonic asymmetry) is a very relevant problem in conventional cosmology and physics, one of the great mysteries of physics. In short, it is the imbalance observed in baryonic matter (the ordinary matter that composes us) and antibaryonic matter. Antimatter particles share the same mass as their matter counterparts, but qualities such as electric charge are opposite.
The most accredited physical theories are unable to provide an explanation of the reason for this asymmetry that manifested itself in baryogenesis. During the hypothetical process of the Big Bang / inflation, equal amounts of matter and antimatter should have been produced. Since from the observations in the observable Universe there does not seem to be much antimatter, it is assumed that some fundamental physical processes have expressed themselves differently. Many explanations have been proposed (Sakharov conditions, regions of the universe in which antimatter dominates, mirror anti-universe, etc.), on which there is no consensus.
Why don't we observe equal quantities of matter and antimatter in the Universe? Where did all the "primordial" antimatter supposedly formed during the Big Bang go? Why did matter prevail over antimatter? So what is the key to the mystery of matter and antimatter?
In my opinion, and in light of the hypotheses advanced in this study, there is no matter-antimatter asymmetry. Or rather, it is evident that the Ordinary Matter (visible) that we observe in the Universe is made of matter and not antimatter. But this asymmetry is not due to the fact that some fundamental physical processes were expressed differently during the Big Bang. Simply, there was no Big Bang / inflation, and therefore, no baryogenesis as predicted by these models.
In other words, in the context of this work, in light of what has been said regarding the process of formation of Ordinary Matter and the entire Universe, the only hypothesis we can make is that antimatter has simply never been formed and that the very modest quantity of existing antimatter is produced in particular phenomena, in high-energy collisions. Personally I think that the only plausible answer to this mystery is that "primordial" antimatter never formed, never existed, just like the Big Bang.
So, here I hypothesize that during the evolution of the Dark InfoStructures that were organized in the most remote times of the life of the Universe, for completely random reasons, at the universal level (or perhaps super local) there was a prevalence of Structures with left-handed chirality to the detriment of right-handed ones (or vice versa, to be verified experimentally and observationally).
This prevalence, at the moment in which the processes of formation of Ordinary Matter were triggered, of InfoStructures of Vortex type Elementary subtype, such as electrons and positrons, determined the exclusive formation of Structures with chirality, for example, left-handed (electrons, and not positrons). These particles, accelerated to speeds close to the limit of propagation of the Elementary Field especially by the intense magnetic fields associated with the Dark Halos in friction, together with their peculiar dynamics, colliding with each other have produced (and continue to produce) other more massive particles (quarks, etc.) which, in complex processes of interaction and progressive decay, have led to composite particles such as protons (hydrogen nuclei), and so on up to stable gaseous nuclei that have fueled the formation of the first generations of stars, through the gravitational collapse of extensive and dense gaseous clouds.
Therefore, the asymmetry of matter over antimatter, according to the hypotheses that I formulate here, would be due to an evolutionary aspect, based on a substantial randomness of prevalence of chirality in the evolution of the Dark Structures that have populated the Universe until the triggering of the processes of formation of Ordinary Matter, determining its direction towards matter at the expense of antimatter.
A final reflection. Collider experiments seem to demonstrate that the laws of nature do not apply equally to matter and antimatter. Symmetry breaking seems to be at work, tipping the balance in favor of matter. Within the framework of hypotheses that we have formulated here, it seems reasonable to think that in the decay of structures produced in high-energy collisions, the processes most sensitive to chirality may be unbalanced by universal global or super-local chirality. It would be like hitting two balls on a billiard table covered with an inhomogeneous surface, with micro protuberances oriented in a circular direction with a specific chirality rather than a smooth and uniform asurface. In the case of microprotuberances, we should expect that the balls in the propagation as in the kinematics of the collision will show significant differences compared to the situation of the smooth and uniform surface. Obviously, everything needs to be verified experimentally and fully elaborated from a theoretical point of view.
Links to the tables of contents of TFNR Paper
