Talk:TFNR - 9.9 Energy and matter in the structured Field

From Evolutionary Knowledge Base
Jump to: navigation, search

In the current scientific culture, energy and matter are heterogeneous term, connected with various and different phenomena of Physical Reality. In turn, we use the term energy to identify the capacity of a physical system to do a work, to express Action, to produce events, to modify the state of an entity, or to produce the expansion of the whole Universe. The same, we can identify many kinds of matter, at least the ordinary matter and the unknown dark matter, many kinds of matter particles, or structures in the Field.

Also in Evolutionary Physics, these two terms can identify different kinds of manifestations of the Action, various states of the Field or different kinds of Structures of Information; at the end, different classes of phenomena. So, it is so important to make order, and correctly define the different terms.

In short, in the field of energy and matter, we can identify two main classes of phenomena:

  • the first class specifically relates to the different states of the Elementary Field, or the states of space-time domains of the Field: mass (in the dark and ordinary forms of matter) and dark energy;
  • the second comprehends all the manifestations of Action that we call ordinary energy: all the form of energy at any level of Physical Reality (i.e. the gravitational, the electrical, magnetic, nuclear, kinetic, energy).

Here in after, we will use a different classification criteria, more …



Mass / Energy

See slide: Energy

Supposed mass/energy composition of the Universe

OM - Ordinary (barionic) matter: 5 % DM – Dark Matter: 25 % DE – Dark Energy: 70 % Total Dark side of the Universe: 95 %

Hypothesis of Information (mass/energy) composition of the Universe

Total mass (DM + OM): 50 % (DM: 85 % + OM: 15 %) Total gravitational energy (DE): 50%

Total energy (non-gravitational energy/Information, radiative, kinetic, etc. energy): ?

OM: 5% OE: ? DM: 45% DE: 50%

A unifying theory of dark energy and dark matter? Matter creation? Negative masses? Gravitational repulsive negative masses? Only OM can coalesce into light-emitting structures No exotic materials!

Vortices… as nature and sources of DM and DE. Interactions through dark structures (made of DM and DE) produce OM, that coalesce into light-emitting structures.

A negative mass fluid, composed by antimatter particles? Always particles, another form of ether… We must try to change our way of thing, our general vision of the physical reality. Stop thinking to particles, that, for conventional physics, represent only the 5% of the energy content of the Universe.

DM + DE and antimatter are completely different things. The dynamics of the DM + DE structures (low density distributed massive structures  DS: dark structures) produces effects that we call cosmic expansion and resemble the cosmological constant.

DM galactic haloes shape produces the flattening of the rotation curves of galaxies. Haloes don’t form “around“ galaxies! Haloes are the main part of what we call galaxies. That haloes host in their central part the coalesced visible ordinary matter attracted by the center of mass of the haloes and the mass of the OM already present in the same haloes. First, the DM + DE vortex structure of an halo forms, that the OM distributed in the surrounding of the halo begins to fall toward the internal part of the halo. Haloes extend to several “visible” galactic radii. So, total or dark galactic haloes radii are much larger than the visible galactic radii, what we improperly call the galactic radius.

DE + DM structures (never think about DE as a entity separate from DM) drives cosmic expansion (this is a phenomenon)  explanation…

DM and EM are not directly observable. They are not phenomena, in narrow sense (but in wider yes, because everything happens, so everything is a phenomenon.

When we talk about Information, Energy, Matter, snapshots of processes of events, Action divided by time, we talk about entities, things that don’t really exist, but that become (derived) sources of existence, because they represent “frozen”, potential, Action, potential sources of events.

It seems a poor distinction, but to me is crucial. Things exist because they happen. Only events really exist, or, in other words, they are the very “substance” of existence. All that we represent as Information, Energy, Mass, objects, etc., are only virtually existents, they derive their existence from the events that happen, that make that “entities” new (derived) sources of events. So, we can rename that entities as potential sources of events, of action.

In particular, in classical physics, we make a clear distinction between kinetic and potential energy. In this E.P. we will always talk of potential energy, the kinetic one being a form of potential energy, as to obtain it we slice the flow of motion action by time. We can see the energy of a system as the potential source of events, of action. To measure the energy of a system, we have to discrete the continuous time dimension. This is one of the most important issues that determinate the weirdness of quantum world and its claim for a granular representation of space and time.


Dark matter is a hypothetical form of matter that is thought to account for approximately 85% of the matter in the universe, and about a quarter of its total energy density. The majority of dark matter is thought to be non-baryonic in nature, possibly being composed of some as-yet undiscovered subatomic particles.[note 1] Its presence is implied in a variety of astrophysical observations, including gravitational effects that cannot be explained unless more matter is present than can be seen. For this reason, most experts think dark matter to be ubiquitous in the universe and to have had a strong influence on its structure and evolution. The name dark matter refers to the fact that it does not appear to interact with observable electromagnetic radiation, such as light, and is thus invisible (or 'dark') to the entire electromagnetic spectrum, making it extremely difficult to detect using usual astronomical equipment.[1]

The primary evidence for dark matter is that calculations show that many galaxies would fly apart instead of rotating, or would not have formed or move as they do, if they did not contain a large amount of unseen matter.[2] Other lines of evidence include observations in gravitational lensing,[3] from the cosmic microwave background, from astronomical observations of the observable universe's current structure, from the formation and evolution of galaxies, from mass location during galactic collisions,[4] and from the motion of galaxies within galaxy clusters. In the standard Lambda-CDM model of cosmology, the total mass–energy of the universe contains 5% ordinary matter and energy, 27% dark matter and 68% of an unknown form of energy known as dark energy.[5][6][7][8] Thus, dark matter constitutes 85%[note 2] of total mass, while dark energy plus dark matter constitute 95% of total mass–energy content.[9][10][11][12]

Because dark matter has not yet been observed directly, it must barely interact with ordinary baryonic matter and radiation. The primary candidate for dark matter is some new kind of elementary particle that has not yet been discovered, in particular, weakly-interacting massive particles (WIMPs), or gravitationally-interacting massive particles (GIMPs).[13] Many experiments to directly detect and study dark matter particles are being actively undertaken, but none has yet succeeded.[14] Dark matter is classified as cold, warm, or hot according to its velocity (more precisely, its free streaming length). Current models favor a cold dark matter scenario, in which structures emerge by gradual accumulation of particles.

Although the existence of dark matter is generally accepted by the scientific community, some astrophysicists, [15] intrigued by certain observations that do not fit the dark matter theory, [16] argue for various modifications of the standard laws of general relativity, such as modified Newtonian dynamics, tensor–vector–scalar gravity, or entropic gravity. These models attempt to account for all observations without invoking supplemental non-baryonic matter. [17]