Talk:TFNR - 2.2 How hard to measure the Universe

Rods and clocks, distances and times, their coupled structures and physical quantities, like the metric, velocity, acceleration, all that we use to measure the Universe and its content are fundamentally, naturally, intrinsically variable, relative, unfixed.

Why is it so?

• QM in the micro with its implications on the macro
• Structured Field...
• for that reasons, rods and clock can never be considered as external tools. They are made of the same "substance" as what we are trying to measure, or better, they are the same "substance" of what we are measuring, the same as everything. Everything is the Field (an organized portion of it) and the Field is everything. A Field that, for its deep nature (this is its existential nature and form), is intrinsecally and incessantly fluctuating in its fundamental dimensions (causal, spatial and temporal). So, when we try to measure a distance of an object in a local environment, we have to consider that both the object to be measured, ...

the same for a time measure of an event in space.

• c is the limit of the speed of propagation of information in the Field, but is not constant. So...

Consequences:

• impossibility to get an infinitely precise measure
• impossibility to get measures valid for any place and any time (for example the expansion rate of the Universe Hubble constant, why there is not universal expansion. The expasion is a phenomena produces by the organization on the cosmos, and therefore is always local, even if it embraces very large scale portion of space)