TFNR - Complex physical quantities and phenomena

From Evolutionary Knowledge Base
Revision as of 19:36, 16 November 2024 by Paolo (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Having completed the overview of what we hypothesize in this model of description of Physical Reality as the fundamental physical Quantities with the related phenomena, let's make some reference to the more complex quantities (and the related derived forces / fields, interactions, properties and phenomena) that emerge in the dynamics of some elementary structures and especially in the dynamics of the most complex structures, such as the Mixed structures - Complex Particles / Vortices and Interactions - among which we find for example the main Composite Structures that make up Ordinary / visible Matter (nucleons, protons and neutrons, their components, quarks) and those that are defined Bosons (interactions / force carriers), in particular Z, W and gluons.

Let's talk in particular about the more complex Forces / Fields (and interactions), closer to the discrete / quantized dimension of Matter:

  • Weak nuclear force and field
  • Strong nuclear force and field

The former are the object of the Quantum Field Theory (QFT) which is called Quantum Flavordynamics (QFD), better represented by the Electroweak Theory (where the electromagnetic interaction and the weak interaction are treated as two different aspects of a single electroweak interaction), the latter are the object of the QFT called Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD). Both as part of the broader Theory called Standard Model of Particles.

These derived forces / fields manifest themselves in interactions characterized by high energy and great turbulence inside complex Structures such as atomic nuclei, nucleons, their components and the bosonic particles that mediate their dynamic relations. Energies and turbulence that lead modeling and its formalization to increasing complexity (virtual particles, masking of effects, infinities, incompatibilities, computational intractability, etc.) and descriptions that are not very plausible from a physical point of view. Without taking anything away from the incredible effort that has seen the scientific community engaged for over a century in one of the most significant adventures in the history of modern science. So, honor to the discoveries, developments and the men and women who with great commitment and effort have sought and achieved them. But, despite all this, there are many, with whom I agree, who say that the most important questions of physics and cosmology have not yet found an answer. It is my humble opinion that in addition to not having achieved the desired results, physics and cosmology have taken dead-end tracks that have led into intellectual swamps, full of observational and experimental evidence that have not been correctly interpreted and increasingly complex math and equations incapable of providing clear and plausible images of natural phenomena.

The topic of these physical quantities and phenomena is extremely complex and goes beyond the scope of this work which represents an introduction to Evolutionary Physics. What we can say at a very superficial level is that we hypothesize that these Derivative Forces and Fields, the associated Action, Information/Energy, Structures, the related Dynamics, interactions, etc. are manifestations of complex interactions of the fundamental Components of Elementary Action that we have described in the previous sections (Perturbation, Translation, Rotation:Chirality and Rotation:AxisOrientation) and in our hypotheses underlie Gravity and Electromagnetism.

Addressing the unification of forces and interactions considering weak and strong nuclear as fundamental forces and interactions as Gravity and Electromagnetism, in my opinion, has led and maintains a stalemate where it seems truly impossible to obtain new advances (the various theories proposed, including Strings and Loop Quantum Gravity, very interesting from a mathematical point of view, do not seem to have the strength to become true physical theories, plausible and testable).

Links to the tables of contents of TFNR Paper