|
|
| (254 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | Something very essential in this model of description of Reality...
| + | #REDIRECT [[TFNR - A first look]] |
| | | | |
| − | This model, that we call Evolutionary Knowledge because of the centrality of the concept of evolution in this approach, aims to give a new vision of Reality and the Universe. Unconventional hypothesis are made to try to explain some of the fundamental unsolved mysteries in physics and cosmology.
| |
| | | | |
| − | Here the key points of the vision of Reality as proposed by Evolutionary Knowledge. These are the qualifying elements, the leading arguments on which, more than others, we must evaluate the capacity of this model to explain, to describe what we observe of Reality and the Universe.
| |
| | | | |
| − | == Reality ==
| + | <!-- mw-body h3: margin-bottom: 12px; --> |
| | + | Something very essential in this model of description of [[Reality]]. |
| | | | |
| − | === What is===
| + | This model, that we call [[Evolutionary Knowledge]] because of the centrality of the concept of [[Evolution]], beside [[Creation]], as the two complementary sub-processes that compose the [[Process of Formation of Reality|Process of Formation]], aims to give a new vision of Reality and the Universe. Many new proposals and unconventional hypothesis are made to try to explain some of the fundamental unsolved mysteries in physics and cosmology, and to reach a wider and deeper unitary representation of Nature. |
| | | | |
| − | *'''We need new concept of Reality and Realism'''
| + | We can see them as key points, qualifying elements, leading arguments on which, more than others, we must evaluate the capacity of this model to explain, to describe what we observe in Nature. |
| | | | |
| − | <blockquote>The tension between GR and QM about realism imposes to reconsider that concept and what we intent for Reality. Reality and Realism are not what GR say us and the same for QM. The renunciation of realism, to which almost all interpretations of QM push us, stems from a limited vision and some erroneous assumptions.</blockquote>
| + | To learn more about these topics, please refer to the page [[TFNR - 2.1 Very important hypotheses about Reality]] and all the pages in this wiki related to the specific topics (please use the wiki search engine or go to the page "[[Wiki Contents Matrix]]"). |
| − | | + | |
| − | *'''Reality and the Universe “does not exist” in a conventional sense, the whole Reality “happens”'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | <blockquote>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.</blockquote>
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Origin and formation ===
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | *'''Creation (or) and Evolution'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | <blockquote>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.</blockquote>
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Sources, Forces and Fields ===
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | *'''The whole Reality is incessantly empowered by a Source of Events/Action (a Force / Field couple)'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | *'''Everything is relative but the Source (Fundamental Force and Elementary Field)'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * '''Different kind of forces/fields: a matter of complexity'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Space and Time ===
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * '''Quantum time symmetry'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Microcosm - Physics ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Action ===
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Information / Energy ===
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * '''Energy is an elementary form of Information (or Information is a complex form of energy)'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * '''Mass, motion, charge and spin: the key is (cor)relation, organization, information'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Matter Particles and/or Waves ===
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * '''Matter is not fundamental, or, better, is not so fundamental...'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * '''Radiation and particles are not the main part of what exists (or rather, “happens”) in Nature'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * '''The “inconstancy” of natural constants and an amazing equivalence'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * '''The shape of particles and atoms is different from what we think and ever changing'''
| + | |
| − | * '''Where is the electron? No point particles. No “solid”, unchangeable particles'''
| + | |
| − | * '''When mass rises, volume (space extension) lowers'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Macrocosm - Cosmology ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === The Origin and the Evolution ===
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * '''No Big Bang! No inflation! We don’t really need things like these…'''
| + | |
| − | * '''The Universe is older than we think'''
| + | |
| − | * '''Only one universe is needed, not many or an infinite number'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === The Shape ===
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * '''The Universe is intrinsically flat'''
| + | |
| − | * '''No limits at all'''
| + | |
| − | * '''Large scale homogeneity of the cosmos'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Dark Matter ===
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * '''Dark matter is not made of particles'''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | === Dark Energy ===
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * '''Dark energy as anti-mass (or positive density mass)'''
| + | |
| − | * '''Cosmic expansion as an effect of the rising complexity of Reality'''
| + | |
We can see them as key points, qualifying elements, leading arguments on which, more than others, we must evaluate the capacity of this model to explain, to describe what we observe in Nature.
