View source for TFNR - Connection between entangled quantum objects


So, what are these "phantom" connections that would occur between entangled particles? <br>Connections that would appear to configure zero-time remote actions at sidereal distances that are not randomly connected or that would imply communications at super-luminal speeds. Connections capable of influencing the quantum state of entangled particles, but not of transferring information. 

Are these physical connections (and then they would be causal connections, immediate actions at a distance, which would allow the transfer of information/energy at zero time) or "logical" connections (shared configurations of the "internal organization" of the InfoStructures involved, of the dynamics of the event points that support them, which remain so until any decoherence, non-causal connections)? 

I would choose the latter, given the results of the experiments. Logical connections, correlation connections. But wouldn't it be more correct to simply call them "correlations" and abandon this term "connections" which makes one think of physical connections, with all their implications? First of all, non-locality, and instant action at a distance... 

Correlations ab origine, established instantly, in the process of preparing the entangled particles. Correlations not only between the overall quantum states of each particle involved, but correlations between the dynamics of the corresponding event points of the Elementary Field (Elementary Action in its Modes / Components), of the various portions of the Structures. 

Portions, not parts! I think this is the key to understanding quantum entanglement without hypothesizing strange instantaneous connections, non-local actions, etc. The union of indeterminacy, elementary particles with non-homogeneous internal distributions (not point-like, nor homogeneous over volumes of space, but with organization of the Elementary Action in each event point), and correlation between the quantum states of the corresponding event points. 
This combination of hypotheses leads us to think of entanglement as a complex correlation between Structures with correlated "internal portions" dynamics, in a context of partially indeterminate processes (the dynamics of the Elementary Field) and partially determined processes (the Information that gives shape to the InfoStructures). <br>Overall correlation of the Structure resulting from the interaction of the internal punctual correlations of the Structures involved. Complexity within complexity. Indeterminacy within indeterminacy. Punctual (or of portions) correlation in the overall correlation. 

Let us remember that if the form of the InfoStructures hypothesized here is true (dynamics of an electron produced by the interaction of mixed, stochastic and deterministic processes, relating to approximately 10^60 event points), then the entanglement of two "simple" electrons is a phenomenon of a monstrous complexity, the result of the correlation, partly indeterminate and partly determinate, of the dynamics of about 10^60 event points of the Elementary Field with that of other 10^60 event points. <br>Faced with the incessant unfolding of this immense mass of dynamic processes, we see the results of apparently banal experiments (e.g. the Stern-Gerlach experiment, electrons that in a magnetic field go up or down according to their Spin, which we assume is up or down). <br>But we hypothesized that Spin up or down is a statistical evaluation of an immense underlying complexity, we could say that the two entangled electrons, each by itself, are carrying out immense quantum calculations in response to a magnetic field to decide whether they are called Spin up or Spin down. No communication. 

Somehow they had agreed before, when the entangled state was created. What can I say... The explanation of this phenomenon cannot lie in simplicity. For me it certainly lies in complexity, in a monstrous and (unfortunately) really hard to fathom complexity.


{{Template:PaperPages1}}